Card_R_40-01 Reading Russell.
Descartes “I think, therefore I am” should have been simply: “there is thinking”. He finds doubt going on & says : There is doubt, doubt is a form of thought, therefore there is thought. “I think” assumes too much. Why should thoughts imply a thinker? Why should not a thinker be a certain series of thoughts connected with each other by causal laws?…
© The Shollond Trust, UK charitable trust (reg. charity no. 1059551)